EDITORIAL
Editorial team and standards
These are the people responsible for Students Life coverage and the standards used to research, edit, update and correct it.
Editorial team
Writers and contributors







Editing and specialist review




Editorial standards
Our goal is to reduce the cost of understanding college life before asking a student to act or buy. Editors remain responsible for every published claim, recommendation and correction.
Research, writing and AI
- Information discoveryAI tools may assist with information discovery and outline development. AI output is not treated as a source.
- Source verificationEditors check factual claims against authoritative or cited sources, including official campus, government and brand pages when those sources control the answer.
- Human accountabilityAn editor reviews every article and remains responsible for the final framing, recommendations and published content.
- People-first purposeWe publish to answer a real student decision, not to fill a keyword target or manufacture apparent expertise.
Editorial credits
- By
- The named writer created the article.
- Edited by
- The named editor checked clarity, scope, sourcing and useful next steps.
- Reviewed by
- A specialist credit appears only when that person actually reviewed the article. It is never assigned automatically.
Updates and corrections
Normal factual, sourcing or clarity improvements update the visible modified date. A material change to an article's meaning, recommendation or safety guidance receives a visible correction note.
Send the page URL, disputed claim and supporting source to contact@students-life.com.
Changing offers
An observed date records when an offer source was collected; it is not an expiry date. Unknown expiry dates remain unknown, only active records are shown publicly and commercial links never determine an editorial verdict.